How did he come to this conclusion. Well, he says his god “revealed it to [him] in such a way that WE can be certain.” I’m not particularly impressed. But then, I think he has “painted himself into a corner” so to speak. He has no evidence for his god. Now, for a personal belief, that might not be a problem. But he wants others to join his belief (and send him money.) He needs some real evidence to accomplish that. (He can teach his dogma to his children. But they can’t send him any money at this time.) He doesn’t have any evidence. He relies exclusively on Presuppositional Baloney. He is unable to argue against anything I say, and has no recourse except to say that his god says I can’t think straight.