Dan doesn’t like naturalism.

     He gets a little long-winded in this because he is trying to avoid the rather plain language.  But what he particularly dislikes about naturalism is that it presupposes that there is no supernatural and presuppositional arguments are inherently dishonest.  Since he claims to be so busy, he really should place it in the simple language that I give.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s